Students' Concept Mastery: Reasoning Ability and Concept Mastery of Evolution

  • Helmi Djuanda university
  • Nuryani Yogipratama Rustaman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Fransisca Sudarto Tapilouw Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Topik Hidayat Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Keywords: Scientific Reasoning, Concept Mastery, Evolution

Abstract

Now a days, students tend to learn the concept of evolution through various sources independently through memorizing or reading on their own and unaware of the mutual relations  among them in everyday life. The tendency leads  makes  learning the concept of evolution becomes meaningless and not profound, even though there are many studies that states  that scientific reasoning will make the knowledge gained more meaningful and profound. This study aims to test the hypothesis, is there  whether any correlation between students' concept mastery levelwith students' scientific reasoning skills in the evolution learning process. A total of 33 students participated in this study. Students' reasoning skills are obtained through the use of Test of logical thinking (TOLT), while students' concept mastery of evolution was assessed using concept knowledge assessment. The results of this study indicate that there is a correlation between students' scientific reasoning skills and students' concept mastery, where the tendency is that students who think formally are more dominant in obtaining high scores or better concept mastery of the knowledge.

References

Abdurrahman, D., Efendi, R., & Wijaya, A.F.C. (2016). Profil Tingkat Penalaran danPeningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Sma dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Ranking Task Exercise Peer Instruction. Jurnal Wahana Pendidika nFisika. Vol.1(2013):84-91

Borgerding, L.A. (2016). Ohio high school biology teachers' view of state standard for evolution: impacts on practice. Science Educator, Vol. 21(1): 1-19

Dunbar, K & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific Thinking and Reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak& R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press

Fraser, B J., Tobin, K.G. & McRobbie, C.J. (2014). Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education

Grossman, W. E & Fleet, C.M. (2017). Changes in Acceptance of Evolution in a College-Level General Education Course. Journal of Biological Education, vol.51(4): 328-335

Helmi., Rustaman, N. Y., Tapilouw, F. S & Hidayat, T. (2019). Misconception Types Analysis on Mechanism of Evolution. J.Phys.: Conference Series. Vol.1175(012169): 1-7

Hewson, P.W., Beeth, M.E & Thorley, N.R. (1998).Teaching for conceptual change International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands:KluwerAcademic Publishers.

Lawson, A.E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11-24.

Nur, S.A & Rahman, A. (2013). Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Sebagai Sarana Mengembangkan Penalaran Formal Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Sainsmat. Vol.2(1) 84-92

Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: development and learning. Journal of Research in Sciences Teaching, Vol. 1(2): 176-186

Shuttleworth, M. (2019). Scientific Reasoning. Retrieved edition, from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/scientific-reasoning

Stammen, A.N., Malone, K.L & Irving, K. (2018). Effects of Modeling Instruction Professional Development on Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills. education science, 8(119), 1-19

Steinberg, R & Sebastian, C. (2013). Understanding and Affecting Science Teacher Candidates’ Scientific Reasoning in Introductory Astrophysics. Physical Review Special Topics-ion Research, Vol.9(2): 1-10

Sukardi. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Kompetensi dan Praktiknya). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Published
2019-08-31
How to Cite
Helmi, Rustaman, N. Y., Tapilouw, F. S., & Hidayat, T. (2019). Students’ Concept Mastery: Reasoning Ability and Concept Mastery of Evolution. Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR), 1(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v1i1.7