PUBLIC POLICY INNOVATION IN DEVELOPING STATE OWNED BUSINESS AGENCIES

  • Yeti Rohayati Universitas Langlangbuana, Indonesia
  • Kurhayadi Kurhayadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Bandung, Indonesia
Keywords: Public Policy Innovation, Public Services, SOE Development

Abstract

State-owned Enterprise (BUMN), as one of the pillars of the Indonesian economy, is guided by the outline of the 1945 contusion and the existence of private entities and cooperatives. In principle, the state's involvement in these activities reflects the substance of article 33 of the amendment of the 1945 constitution. One of the missions of BUMN is to serve by innovating. Public policy innovating is a necessity that must be done to overcome problems that exist in society. From the point of view of public policy studies and public services, it can be seen that the government has developed several SOE development strategies that lead the country to face charges in the organizational environment and also to reduce the negative label attached to the bureaucracy. One of the goals of public policy innovation is to improve the quality of public services. The obstacle faced in public policy innovation is that there is no comprehensive study on the development and sustainability of policy innovation in public services in Indonesia

References

Beal, P. (2008). A dictionary of English manuscript terminology: 1450 to 2000. Oxford University Press.

Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. UGM PRESS.

Gow, J. I. (2014). Public Sector Innovation Theory Revisited. 19, 22.

Hartley, Jean. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34.

Hartley, John. (2005). Creative industries. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Sage.

Islamy, I. (2000). Principles of State Policy Formulation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Islamy, M. I. (2000). Prinsip-Prinsip Kebijaksanaan Negara. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 243–246.

Klein, K., & Sora, J. (1996). The challenge of implementation innovation. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 1(1), 40.

Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1990). Guidelines for Conducting Service Quality Research. Marketing Research, 2(4).

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation (pp. 25–38). Springer.

Rogers, E. M. (2002). Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addictive Behaviors, 27(6), 989–993.

Srimulyo, K. (2001). MENAKAR PERAN BUMN DI ERA OTONOMI. 22.

Suwarno, Y. (2008). Inovasi di sektor publik.

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46.

Published
2021-08-05
How to Cite
Rohayati, Y., & Kurhayadi, K. (2021). PUBLIC POLICY INNOVATION IN DEVELOPING STATE OWNED BUSINESS AGENCIES. Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR), 3(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v3i2.88